ISO11011 – correctly serviced

25 October, 2016

Until recently there was no process specific standard for assessing the energy efficiency of compressed air systems and therefore its running costs. Now by applying ISO11011 you could save a lot of money and improve your profitability.

You can’t fail to have noticed that the European Union is driving through more and more legislation on Energy Efficiency. At the moment the Energy Saving Opportunities Scheme (ESOS) only applies to companies with more than 250 employees or with a turnover greater than 50 million euros or with a balance sheet greater than 43 million Euros.

If these criteria do not apply to you then you may have breathed a sigh of relief. But you are mistaken; in today’s competitive world with increasing pressure on margins, any activity that can improve your bottom line has to be worth exploring.

And compressed air systems can typically cost you around 10 per cent of your annual electricity bills, so it is an area that demands your focus. Can you honestly say what the annual running costs of your compressed air system is? How much energy does it waste through leakage? Or whether the plant or equipment is fit for purpose?

In the past assessments of compressed air systems were either not done at all, or relied on non-standardised procedures and tests. The problem is that some of these could be unsuitable, inaccurate, too expensive and ultimately non-productive.

Roles and responsibilities

ISO 11011 was produced and published with input from BCAS. This has now been developed and adopted as the European Standard EN ISO 11011. The standard identifies the roles and responsibilities of those involved in the assessment and it considers compressed air systems as three functional subsystems:

• Supply, which includes the conversion of the primary energy source to compressed air energy.

• Transmission, which includes the movement of compressed air energy from where it is generated to where it is used.

• Demand, which includes the total of all compressed air consumers for both end use applications and compressed air waste.

This approach provides a structured framework for data analysis, reporting and documenting any findings. It identifies the estimated energy savings as a result of the assessment and thus a clear means of reducing your costs. It also identifies the methodologies used for such an assessment, which might include: observation and research, spot check measurements and/or data logging – including dynamic and trend.

This accounts for each compressed air system being different in terms of age, its location and use, so the requirements for assessment will vary. It also means that you can use the most appropriate methodology, either in part or full. So, for example, it may not be necessary to carry out extensive data logging if simple observations and existing data are enough to complete your assessment. Regardless of the methodologies used, taking a whole system approach ensures that you get the maximum benefit from the assessment process.